"Green Energy Genocide": Allan Malcolm MacRae's controversial challenge to the climate change narrative
- Engineer and Earth Sciences expert Allan Malcolm MacRae's new book, "Green Energy Genocide: The Climate Scam," challenges the foundations of the climate change narrative, arguing it is scientifically flawed and a deliberate deception with severe consequences.
- MacRae traces the origins of "Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming" (CAGW) to 1985, claiming it was a political construct by the United Nations rather than a scientific consensus, designed to mislead the public and policymakers.
- The book contends that climate change is a natural occurrence and criticizes the focus on CO2 as the primary driver of climate change. MacRae suggests that low CO2 levels are more dangerous than high levels, referencing the last Ice Age as an example.
- MacRae accuses proponents of the climate change narrative of promoting falsehoods for political and financial gain, leading to the misallocation of funds into inefficient green energy projects. He advocates for a return to reliable, dispatchable energy sources and emphasizes the importance of addressing genuine environmental challenges like pollution and access to clean water.
In a world increasingly divided by the climate change debate, engineer and Earth Sciences expert Allan Malcolm MacRae has emerged as a provocative voice with his new book, "
Green Energy Genocide: The Climate Scam." His work questions the very foundations of the climate change narrative, arguing that it is not only scientifically flawed but also a deliberate deception with dire consequences.
MacRae's journey into the heart of this controversy began in 1985, when the concept of "Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming" (CAGW) first took shape. According to MacRae, this was not a scientific consensus but a political construct orchestrated by the United Nations. He asserts that the narrative was designed to mislead the public and policymakers, capitalizing on fears of a climate catastrophe that he believes was never substantiated by genuine scientific evidence.
MacRae emphasizes that climate change is a natural phenomenon throughout the book, arguing that the Earth has undergone numerous climate shifts throughout its history. He contends that the current focus on carbon dioxide (CO2) as a primary driver of climate change is misplaced. In fact, he goes a step further, suggesting that low CO2 levels pose a greater threat to life on Earth than high levels. To support this, he points to the last Ice Age, during which diminished CO2 levels nearly halted photosynthesis, potentially leading to an extinction event.
MacRae does not mince words when it comes to the motivations behind the climate change narrative. He accuses proponents of the movement of knowingly promoting falsehoods, driven by political and financial incentives. He claims that the narrative has led to the misallocation of trillions of dollars into green energy projects that he deems inefficient and unreliable.
The author argues that the focus on intermittent energy sources like wind and solar has jeopardized the stability of power grids. Instead, he advocates for dispatchable generation, which can be programmed on demand, as the cornerstone of a reliable energy supply. MacRae believes that the obsession with green energy has resulted in energy shortages and increased costs, disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable populations.
To bolster his arguments, MacRae draws on a range of scientific studies and the work of like-minded scientists. He cites research indicating that cold weather is far more lethal than warm weather, casting doubt on the fear of CO2-driven warming. Furthermore, he argues that the climate's sensitivity to atmospheric CO2 is minimal, debunking the notion of an imminent fossil-fuel-induced climate crisis.
MacRae highlights the work of scientists such as Dr. Ole Humlum and Dr. Benny Peiser, who have also questioned the climate crisis narrative. Humlum's 2022 report, for instance, found evidence of gentle warming but no indication of dramatic changes. Peiser's assessments have consistently shown little alteration in climate trends over the past three decades.
Beyond challenging the scientific basis of the climate narrative, MacRae delves into the human consequences of the green energy agenda. He argues that the pursuit of green energy has led to energy shortages and higher costs, impacting millions of people worldwide.
MacRae also criticizes the impact on developing countries, where the denial of fossil fuel energy has, in his view, exacerbated poverty and suffering. He argues that the focus on CO2 reduction has diverted attention from more pressing environmental issues, such as pollution and access to clean water.
In the final chapters of the book, MacRae presents his vision for the future. He advocates for a return to reliable, dispatchable energy sources, emphasizing the importance of energy efficiency and the abatement of real atmospheric pollution. He believes that the climate narrative has become a distraction from genuine environmental challenges and he calls for a reevaluation of priorities.
In conclusion, "Green Energy Genocide: The Climate Scam" is a contentious and thought-provoking critique of the prevailing climate change narrative. Whether one agrees with MacRae's views or not, his book is a compelling contribution to an ongoing and critical debate.
Learn more about the "
Green Energy Genocide" by watching the video below.
This video is from the
BrightLearn channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Brighteon.ai
Brighteon.com
Parler
Gab
Copy
